Each of the following three statements is a generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Functions involved are generally assumed to be differentiable.
A. If C is a parametrized path from the point A to the point B in n-space, and f is a scalar-valued function of n variables, then
B. If S is a piece of parameterized surface in 3-space with (parameterized) boundary \partial S and F is a vector-field in 3-space that is well-behaved near S, then
C. If D is a solid domain in 3-space with boundary surface \partial D, oriented by its normal pointing outside D, and F is a vector-field in 3-space that is well-behaved in and around D, then
Let F be the vector field in space that is given by
Apply statement (A) above to evaluate the integral of F over
the line segment from the origin to the point (1, 2, 3).
either semi-circle in the plane x + y - z = 0 traversed from the origin to the point (1, 2, 3).
Apply statement (C) above to evaluate the integral of F over the sphere of radius a > 0 with center at the origin when the sphere is parameterized using ``longitude'' and ``co-latitude''.
How, if at all, can any of the above statements be an aid in working with the surface integral of the vector field F over the hemisphere of radius a > 0 with center at the origin in the upper half z > 0 of space ?
How does ``Green's Theorem'' fit into this outline?
What structural similarities do the three statements A, B, and C share?